Letters of Note: Dear Einstein, Do Scientists Pray?
In January of 1936, a young girl named Phyllis wrote to Albert Einstein on behalf of her Sunday school class, and asked, “Do scientists pray?” Her letter, and Einstein’s reply, can be read below.
(Source: Dear Professor Einstein; Image: Albert Einstein in 1947, via Life.)The Riverside Church
January 19, 1936
My dear Dr. Einstein,
We have brought up the question: Do scientists pray? in our Sunday school class. It began by asking whether we could believe in both science and religion. We are writing to scientists and other important men, to try and have our own question answered.
We will feel greatly honored if you will answer our question: Do scientists pray, and what do they pray for?
We are in the sixth grade, Miss Ellis’s class.
Respectfully yours,
Phyllis
———————————
January 24, 1936
Dear Phyllis,
I will attempt to reply to your question as simply as I can. Here is my answer:
Scientists believe that every occurrence, including the affairs of human beings, is due to the laws of nature. Therefore a scientist cannot be inclined to believe that the course of events can be influenced by prayer, that is, by a supernaturally manifested wish.
However, we must concede that our actual knowledge of these forces is imperfect, so that in the end the belief in the existence of a final, ultimate spirit rests on a kind of faith. Such belief remains widespread even with the current achievements in science.
But also, everyone who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that some spirit is manifest in the laws of the universe, one that is vastly superior to that of man. In this way the pursuit of science leads to a religious feeling of a special sort, which is surely quite different from the religiosity of someone more naive.
With cordial greetings,
your A. Einstein
This is really wild. The folks at MIT’s Media Lab are incredible.
MIT Creates Amazing UI From Levitating Orbs
It’s more than some parlor trick; this demo could be the future of user interface.
Source: fastcodesign.com
It’s official: I’m pursuing a Ph.D.
I’ve officially accepted an offer of admission to Stony Brook University’s doctoral program in biomedical engineering, where I’ll be continuing my research in medical physics and digital breast tomosynthesis. I’m very excited to embark on this next stage of my education.
I’m not sure adding touchscreens to everything qualifies as “good design,” but I’m glad that medical device companies are finally considering form in addition to function.
A Gold Rush In Medical Design, Inspired Partly By iPads
There’s a “gold rush” in the medical field to create a new device to treat chronic hypertension in minutes. How do you stand out? Look to touch screens.
Source: fastcodesign.com
Physics and Medicine: The Lancet
The Lancet publishes a series exploring the relationship between medicine and physics, the history and importance of imaging in medicine, and the tremendous impact physics will have on medicine in years to come.
Physics has made critically important contributions to health ever since the birth of medicine 5000 years ago. These contributions have been, and continue to be, many and varied: diagnosis (X-rays, nuclear medicine, clinical PET scanning, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, magnetoencephalography, high-intensity focused ultrasound with MRI); treatment (radiotherapy, minimal-access surgery, interventional MRI, photonics, scaling theory); and a combination of diagnosis and treatment. These contributions will grow as the molecular mechanisms of disease are better understood and as new technologies enable the investigation of these molecular processes in vivo. Medical physicists have an especially important part to play; for example, in patient safety, ensuring the safe, as well as the effective, implementation of new physics-based health technologies.
Radium and Lab Cats: Cancer’s History
In “The T-Cell Army,” [sub. req.] Jerome Groopman writes about new approaches to curing cancer that involve activating the body’s own immune responses to fight tumors. Recently, researchers have found that the body’s white blood cells can be stimulated to shrink tumors, leading to startling remissions in some patients. For over a hundred years, doctors have relied on chemotherapy and radiation as the only effective ways of treating the disease.
- Click through for the story behind the above images, and for more images of the methods and people from the last century of fighting cancer: http://nyr.kr/ITWoK6
Source: newyorker.com
Google offers a sneak peek at their long rumored “Google Glasses,” code-named “Project Glass.” This is pretty wild, and while some are concerned about privacy issues, the reality is that this direction of technology is inevitable. Can you imagine the impact on medical applications?
Alexis Madrigal: 20 Services Google Thinks Are More Important Than Google Scholar
I know I’m not representative of the average person. I’m a guy who trolls through PubMed Central for fun and buys 1950s technology ephemera. As such, I think Google Scholar is one of the most wonderful things Google (or any technology company) has ever created. I use the cross-publisher academic search tool every single day, even many times a day.
Apparently, Google’s not as convinced of Scholar’s worth. It doesn’t appear across the main Google navigation bar, which features nine other services: Search, Image Search, Maps, Play, YouTube, News, Gmail, Documents, and Calendar. But OK, it is more niche than any of those applications and it used to reside in the More menu at the top right of the nav bar. No longer. Google has now moved Scholar to the ‘Even More’ section. That ranks its importance in the Googlesphere behind Translate, Mobile, Books, Offers, Wallet, Shopping, Blogger, Reader, Finance, Photos, and Videos.
Google, of course, has the right to play with its user interface, even to the detriment of my predilections. But I worry that this is a signal that the company is turning away from Google Scholar like it has some other recent projects. After all, it is the sort of revenue-less service that seems endangered under Larry Page.
So, let me just say this: Don’t do it, Larry! This is an invaluable tool for content creators that will not be easily replicated. If you kill Google Scholar, our web won’t be the same.
Source: The Atlantic
Buddhism and The Internet of Things « Wireless Sensor Networks Blog
“Will this knowledge of our connection to all other things make us better people? Or will we just fuel our addiction to stimulation, becoming experience junkies who use increasingly advanced devices to post updates, tweets and check-ins and win badges, rewards and social status?”
In a very near future there will be an invisible web linking together human beings, physical objects and their virtual representations in an information network. The size of the Internet of Things will be enormous: Ericsson predicts 50 billion devices connected to the Internet in 2020. But we have already passed the threshold in which there are more devices connected to the Internet than there are humans. As a matter of fact, one Internet message in 20 is sent from machine to machine (rather than by human to human), and with the latest version of the Internet—IPv6—we will have Internet addresses for every atom on the face of the earth.
But long before the Internet of Things became a geek meme, Eastern philosophers also had a vision of an “invisible web” connecting all things. As Buddhist Geeks founder Vincent Horn says, “The universe is the original Internet of Things.”
For Horn, the interesting question about our networked future is whether the Internet of Things allows us to “hack the universe” by designing technologies that enable us to feel true spiritual interconnectivity. According to Buddhist theory, you become free only once your actions are harmonized with how things already work. And you become aware of how things are connected only once you understand their interdependence.
More info here.
Source: smarterplanet
“The universe is in us.” Neil deGrasse Tyson, The Most Astounding Fact
This is truly beautiful.

